Amal and George Clooney were spotted leaving Venice 03.09.2017

Amal and George Clooney have been spotted leaving the Cipriani Hotel with their twins Ella and Alexander in Venice, Italy on Sunday September 3rd, 2017.

 

Style Files

Amal Cooney wore

MONSE

Sleeveless Silk Asymmetric-Neck Top, Black
Original: $820
NOW: $ 245

was available here

 

MONSE

Wide-Leg Striped Pants, Black/White
Original: $ 2,058.30
NOW: $ 615.94

was available here

 

 

with LINDA FARROW

567 C6 OVERSIZED SUNGLASSES

Gold

£515.00

available here

 

  

 

 

 

*****************************

 

via Chi Magazine

Advertisements

41 thoughts on “Amal and George Clooney were spotted leaving Venice 03.09.2017

  1. Enjoy seeing them haul their babies around, though I think those pictures are intrusive.. I personally believe the babies should be off limits to photographers. I don’t have problems with George and Amal getting their picture taken…they chose this life. The babies should have privacy, if and when they decide to show them off then that is their choice. It is cute to see the giraffe hanging from the carrier. In the long interview in the Hollywood reporter that just came out, they give info about the birth, etc and George mentions that Amal’s favorite animal is a giraffe. Sweet !!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I don’t think she spends a penny on designer cloths, jewelry, makeup or hair done. All is given to her to wear as long as there are photographers around. It is a regular business for celebrities and a win deal for both parties. Even her makeup is explained online for you to know what was used on her and you can buy. Most of her brands have her image on its twitter accounts. She is not idle, she is working and earning with each outing and each item she wears.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. You have to read the article from Hollywood reporter it’s amazing!! I loved it and George was so open! By the way these pants are so nice!! I don’t like the baby picture being taken this way nat you should remove

    Like

    • I’ve had three C- sections and after six weeks you can lift anything you like Its now been three months Please cease with these cruel comments I think they look like a beautiful family

      Like

      • I did have a Csection too and unfortunately a hernia in the same location several months later. The is no cruelty here, just a bit of common sense and reality. Also about your weird “cruelty” remark, Jenny, I think we all agree here that they are a gorgeous, famous, attractive, elegant and multi millionaire couple and now family. Nothing cruel or wrong about that, isn’t it Jenny? Sounds like that’s all it matters.

        Like

  3. Nati- George has made a big deal about privacy for his babies so I am not clear why you are not honoring that. The photos you shared were obviously taken by a drone or someone with a telephoto lens. Out of courtesy for George’s request for privacy (and Amal’s) I would like to see them removed. It is clear from the photos of the bassinets taken on shore that they went out of their way to cover the area where their babies face could be viewed.

    To those who may disagree with me, I am not interested in your opinion about invasions of privacy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • @Jackson
      You’ve got some nerve and your comment is, as usual, overreaching and just plain rude.
      Who do you think you are?
      I’ve got a solution for you. Don’t come here. There are plenty of sites that cover Amal and George where you’d likely be more comfortable.
      Or better yet, open your own blog. You do the work it takes to upkeep a blog and monitor comments to your own satisfaction.
      Do us all a favor and take your condescension elsewhere.
      Otherwise, just shut the hell up. You’re redundant and tiresome.

      Like

    • Jackson and others whining about the privacy issue- people who are famous expect a reasonable amount of privacy- this does not apply to being out in the physical public, in a city, getting into taxis. They are not in their home, where a responsible request for privacy would apply and should be honoured. They are in Venice, in the public. It doesn’t matter whether they are taken by long lens; what matters is the location of the subjects during the time the picture is taken. Just because they probably don’t want the babies’ picture taken at that time, does not mean they are not going to be taken or that the photographers don’t have the legal right to take them. Also, nati even made sure to publish pics with blocked out faces. This is her site. She is not infringing on any legal rights. Read about a “normal expectation of privacy” for celebs. This location does not fall under that. Your preferences or feelings about the pictures, based on your own opinion and George’s article/desires do not reflect the law. This is why they are published everywhere.

      Like

    • Just because George “makes a big deal” about something doesn’t mean anyone has to honour that. The photographers took the photos legally as they are in a public space and that is what matters.

      Like

    • I personally believe that babies/children should be off limits to photographers. However, I do not think you have a right to tell Nati what she should or should not post. This is her blog and she gets to determine that, whether we like it or not. I respect her for doing that. In the first set of pictures, they were taken on private property. George and Amal quickly came out with a statement against those private pictures as an invasion of privacy. These new pictures were taken in public, I don’t like it and possibly George and Amal may not like it, but they were taken legally. It is terrible, but this is the reality for people in the public eye. In the recent Hollywood Reporter article, George talks about this. He says that things done & said about him, he doesn’t agree with and he uses the words ” eat it”…..meaning he has no choice but to accept some of this stuff…. To my knowledge, there has been no response from the Clooney’s concerning these pictures. This is bound to happen and they probably realize that and are letting it go. They may decide in the future to release a picture to possibly lessen the amount of curiosity about their children.

      Like

      • I agree with Jackson – especially since the previous pictures that George was upset about he threatened to sue. I agree with Jackson and mentioned in my previous post up above Nat you shown remove those it’s not classy at all.

        Like

      • Agree. Celebrity-ism is a job like any other. And in this game, to have the privileges, you choose the price. Being a doctor comes with years of study and long hours. They go hand in hand. Being a plumber means you deal with people’s sh*t. There is no such thing as privacy, spontaneity or anonymity in celebrity-ism – but George and Amal knew that going in – you want the fame and fortune, then don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

        Like

    • The best part of Jackson’s comment is s/he states S/HE would like the photos taken. I love this sense of authority and entitlement on someone else’s blog. Acts like a man, writes like a man and probably looks like one too.

      Like

    • Come on now! demand Nati to remove the pictures is not right. George was upset that the photographer took a picture of them INSIDE his property. This picture in question was NOT taken inside their property. Amal and George knew they were going to be photographed so if they did not want to show the babies they could have covered their faces somehow…. place a little curtain on the baby carrier..something… i think that is the price to pay for being so famous. But my main point is.. for these pictures i dont think Nati is being inappropriate by posting them at all. And i find your orders to Nati to be a bit off limits. Nati has for a long time proved to be a great blogger who is ethical and considerate. So please give Nati a break… and besides.. it is HER blog! Peace ❤

      Like

      • @Nadia so are you my clone? hehehe should i place my name as Nadia1 since i was here first? So our comments dont get seen as same person?

        Like

  4. This outfit reminds me of Amal’s old, quirky style, which I loved and positively miss! I miss Amal Allamudin, a stylish, self-assured human rights attorney with a presumably strong work ethic. She looks happy and I can only hope that she is happy. FYI:. In looking at photos of her before marrying Clooney, she seems fresh faced and naturally pretty. If she has had work done, it wasn’t much, but I can tell that her make up artist goes extremely heavy on the make up. It ages her ten years. Again, I miss Amal!

    Like

  5. Sasha, Amanda, and Katkan 2: I suggest each of you get off your righteous high horse and do some background reading about ethics in journalism and the use of photographs. Soos also made the same recommendation to Nati so while you are doing a sweep of your anger about something as basic as privacy you want to include everyone.

    Chi Magazine is a gossip rag and has been sued by Prince William over nude photos of Kate which it took with a telephoto lens while they were on vacation. Closer Magazine is another gossip rag that has been sued and were recently required to pay. California now has legislation prohibiting the photographs of children.

    This is a matter of decency and respect. I am quite sure because of the way you present yourself that if it was your baby where you had said no photographs and had gone out of your way to make sure your baby’s photo was not taken that you would be furious if a photo had been taken and published. How do I know this? But of the way you reacted to my asking that Nati remove the photos. People who are as angry as you are about the invasion of privacy are loose canons.

    Like

    • Thank You so much for the good laugh this morning. I love to laugh. I will now go spend my day with my two amazing children and my wonderful husband of almost 15 years. I am a very blessed and happy woman that is loved and cared for….I have wonderful family and friends, a lovely home and all the other basic necessities of life. I have people that tell me they love me everyday. You on the other hand ???????? I will leave it at that……I hope you have a great day…..

      Like

    • Yeah decency and respect towards the PR money making. I know. Chi magazine did get the photos without photographers being called by the Clooneys PR. Clooneys were not posing and she did have makeup, hair and brand names clothes. To make it worse it showed his belly. Not flattering about the most gorgeous man in the world and the most gorgeous couple (so they say). Clooneys control every picture, every outing, every clothes, every move … Because that’s their profession, press and pictures are needed to promote his tequila, his coffee, his movies, her brand name fashion, her makeup, her conferences, her clients. Kids pictures are okay when he says is okay. You only saw Clooney threatening Chi, not the other tons of pictures of them including the babies ones because these have been approved by them and they look pretty cute, don’t they? As a matter of fact,let’s be realistic, the new pictures are needed now, he has a movie with not exciting reviews so far, and she has a Conference and some more fashion to model here. cash in…
      Give me beak about your ” ethics” Jackson and about giving orders to Nati. You have some nerve insulting everyone else here, especially the owner. If you don’t like this blog, why don’t you move your verbiage garbage elsewhere ? Or you are also cashing in?

      Like

    • @Jackson
      What we have here is a classic case of projection, yet, ironically it’s you who is accusing us of just that. Thanks for the laugh!
      I, for one, don’t have an angry bone in my body. I do, however, have very little patience for uppity condescension and arrogant moralization.
      In other words, look in the mirror. Take a moment to reflect upon that.
      This isn’t the first time you’ve felt the desire to lambaste Nati for her choices and management of her blog. I think we’re up to four or five times now, and I only read here off and on.
      As for Soos, yes, she too needs to get off her ‘high horse’, but at least she doesn’t use the same nasty tone as you do.
      I’ll reiterate my suggestion of opening your own blog but will add that maybe the two of you can split the costs and the work it takes to run your own blog? Something tells me there would be very few comments going through.
      Have a nice day!

      Like

    • Jackson- you projected exactly your characteristics- righteous and high horse. Perhaps you should perform some reading on reasonable expectation of privacy. Outside in public does not fall under this category. Also, just because George doesn’t like something, or makes a stink, doesn’t mean the world has to follow suit and accommodate. The pictures were legally taken, regardless of publication. The end.

      Like

    • Everyone here, why don’t we ignore this individual named Jackson ?Let her/him in be alone in his/her personal ugly world. Eventually he/she will go way if is being ignored.. I think this is the best way to have peace. ;- )

      Like

  6. George is looking haggard like he’s breastfeeding these kids himself, he is definitely not a pretty sight, worse since the birth of the twins, so maybe he has taken on too much. He looks really happy and relaxed with Randy Gerber (no wives around!) and together with his pals. With women he has no chemistry, looking always tense, bored, disconnected and unhappy.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s